|  |   |   | 
 Although the term fell into disfavor at the end of the 20th century, 
        Latter-day Saints have a long tradition of championing "free agency," 
        the idea that God teaches us wisdom but lets us govern ourselves (cf. 
        D&C 37:4). From the story of the council in heaven (Moses 
        4:1-3), we learn that God holds inviolable our freedom to live 
        as we choose. Lucifer's arguments against free agency are unwittingly 
        echoed today by moralists who fear that liberty will lead to license or 
        by managers who want to maximize efficiency by restricting independence 
        or individuality. 
       Being free to choose should "cheer up [our] hearts" (2 
        Ne. 10:23) and give us confidence to exercise our own initiative 
        (D&C 58:26-29). Yet the council in heaven 
        also teaches that agency is dangerous. We cannot expect to be shielded 
        from the consequences of choices, our own or others'. Human beings have 
        the power to inflict suffering on individuals, families, nations, or the 
        environment—and we will reap what we sow, for good or for evil (Gal. 
        6:7; D&C 6:33). 
       Historically, Latter-day Saints have been slower to recognize infringements 
        on free agency within the church than we have been to protest impositions 
        on our freedom from outside. If democracy and constitutional rights help 
        protect freedom in civil society (D&C 98:5), 
        it is not clear why similar structures would not be desirable safeguards 
        against the everpresent threat of compulsion or unrighteous dominion within 
        the church as well (D&C 121:34-44).    
         
          | Related Topics: |   
		  |  Judgment |  |  |  
 
  
       
         
          | Know This, That Every 
            Soul Is Free  (Hymns 240) |  
         
          | Joseph Smith: I teach 
            them correct principles and let them govern themselves. |   
          | Quoted in LDS Church 
            News, February 24, 1990 |   
       
         
          | Orson F. Whitney: 
              Force can never win in a controversy involving the conscience or 
              soul of man. "It may compel the body, but it cannot convince 
              the mind." Thought is forever unfettered. . . Freedom to believe, 
              man cannot give; the right to act, where action injures no one, 
              he cannot in justice, take away.
 |   
          | Life of Heber C. Kimball 
            (Salt Lake City: Junvenile Instructor Office, 1888), 133-134 |   
       
         
          | John A. Widtsoe: Since 
              the law of free agency is ever uppermost in the plan of salvation, 
              the Lord who gave the law must respect it, even though He weep at 
              the errors of His children. It would be a violation of His own plan, 
              should He step in. . . . Mankind, however sorrowful the condition, 
              must fight its own battles, and win its own victories.  |   
          | Evidences and Reconciliations 
            (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1960), 217 |   
       
         
          | Richard L. Evans: In 
            the use of our free agency we have made a few and more than a few 
            mistakes. Some of them are costly, and we shouldn't repeat them, and 
            we should avoid making them in the first place, if possible. But the 
            contrary plan was the plan of Lucifer, the plan whereby [we] would 
            not have been permitted to have freedom to make mistakes. |   
          | Conference Report, 
            April 1950, 104 |   
       
         
          | Henry D. Moyle: God 
              is dependent in large measure upon his children in the exercise 
              of their own free agency to carry out his will and to accomplish 
              his purposes upon the earth.
             |   
          | Conference Report, 
            April 1962, 101 |  
       
         
          | Howard W. Hunter: 
              God's chief way of acting is by persuasion and patience and long-suffering, 
              not by coercion and stark confrontation. He acts by gentle solicitation 
              and by sweet enticement. He always acts with unfailing respect for 
              the freedom and independence that we possess. 
             |   
          | That We Might Have Joy 
            (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1994), 78 |  
 |   |  |